|
|
|
@ -11338,6 +11338,12 @@ and eliminates extraneous terms at translation |
|
|
|
time~\cite{DanvyN03}. Extraneous terms come in various disguises as we |
|
|
|
shall see later in this chapter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complete exposure of the control flow makes CPS a good fit for |
|
|
|
implementing control operators such as effect handlers. It is an |
|
|
|
established intermediate representation used by compilers, providing |
|
|
|
it with merits as a practical compilation |
|
|
|
target~\cite{Appel92,Kennedy07}. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this chapter is to use the CPS formalism to develop a |
|
|
|
universal implementation strategy for deep, shallow, and parameterised |
|
|
|
effect handlers. Section~\ref{sec:target-cps} defines a suitable |
|
|
|
@ -19475,8 +19481,9 @@ design space of deep and parameterised notions of multi handlers have |
|
|
|
yet to be explored as well as their applications domains. Thus an |
|
|
|
interesting future direction of research would be to extend $\HCalc$ |
|
|
|
with multi handlers and explore their practical programming |
|
|
|
applicability. The effect system pose an interesting design challenge |
|
|
|
for multi handlers as any problematic quirks that occur with unary |
|
|
|
applicability. Retrofitting the effect system of $\HCalc$ to provide a |
|
|
|
good programmer experience for programming with multi handlers pose an |
|
|
|
interesting design challenge as any quirks that occur with unary |
|
|
|
handlers only get amplified in the setting of multi handlers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{Handling linear resources} The implementation of effect |
|
|
|
|
