dhil
/
phd-dissertation
mirror of https://github.com/dhil/phd-dissertation
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

Fix rendering of rule labels in mathpar

master
Daniel Hillerström 6 years ago
parent
e52bd8867f
commit
ba1ea599d8
2 changed files with 10 additions and 9 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Unified View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 13
      macros.tex
  2. 6
      thesis.tex

13
macros.tex
View File

@ -99,12 +99,13 @@
%% Labels %% Labels
%% %%
\newcommand{\slab}[1]{\textrm{#1}} \newcommand{\slab}[1]{\textrm{#1}}
\newcommand{\klab}[1]{\textrm{K-#1}}
\newcommand{\semlab}[1]{\textrm{S-#1}}
\newcommand{\tylab}[1]{\textrm{T-#1}}
\newcommand{\mlab}[1]{\text{\scshape{M-#1}}}
\newcommand{\siglab}[1]{\text{\scshape{Sig-#1}}}
\newcommand{\rowlab}[1]{\text{\scshape{R-#1}}}
\newcommand{\rulelabel}[2]{\ensuremath{\mathsf{#1\textrm{-}#2}}}
\newcommand{\klab}[1]{\rulelabel{K}{#1}}
\newcommand{\semlab}[1]{\rulelabel{S}{#1}}
\newcommand{\tylab}[1]{\rulelabel{T}{#1}}
\newcommand{\mlab}[1]{\rulelabel{M}{#1}}
\newcommand{\siglab}[1]{\rulelabel{Sig}{#1}}
\newcommand{\rowlab}[1]{\rulelabel{R}{#1}}
%% %%
%% Syntactic categories. %% Syntactic categories.

6
thesis.tex
View File

@ -868,9 +868,9 @@ that the binder $x : A$.
\semlab{App} & (\lambda x^A . \, M) V &\reducesto& M[V/x] \\ \semlab{App} & (\lambda x^A . \, M) V &\reducesto& M[V/x] \\
\semlab{TyApp} & (\Lambda \alpha^K . \, M) A &\reducesto& M[A/\alpha] \\ \semlab{TyApp} & (\Lambda \alpha^K . \, M) A &\reducesto& M[A/\alpha] \\
\semlab{Split} & \Let \; \Record{\ell = x;y} = \Record{\ell = V;W} \; \In \; N &\reducesto& N[V/x,W/y] \\ \semlab{Split} & \Let \; \Record{\ell = x;y} = \Record{\ell = V;W} \; \In \; N &\reducesto& N[V/x,W/y] \\
\semlab{Case$_1$} &
\semlab{Case_1} &
\Case \; (\ell~V)^R \{ \ell \; x \mapsto M; y \mapsto N\} &\reducesto& M[V/x] \\ \Case \; (\ell~V)^R \{ \ell \; x \mapsto M; y \mapsto N\} &\reducesto& M[V/x] \\
\semlab{Case$_2$} &
\semlab{Case_2} &
\Case \; (\ell~V)^R \{ \ell' \; x \mapsto M; y \mapsto N\} &\reducesto& N[(\ell~V)^R/y], \hfill\quad \text{if } \ell \neq \ell' \\ \Case \; (\ell~V)^R \{ \ell' \; x \mapsto M; y \mapsto N\} &\reducesto& N[(\ell~V)^R/y], \hfill\quad \text{if } \ell \neq \ell' \\
\semlab{Let} & \semlab{Let} &
\Let \; x \revto \Return \; V \; \In \; N &\reducesto& N[V/x] \\ \Let \; x \revto \Return \; V \; \In \; N &\reducesto& N[V/x] \\
@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ some label $\ell$ binds the payload $V$ to $x$ and the remainder $W$
to $y$ in the continuation $N$. to $y$ in the continuation $N$.
% %
Disjunctive case splitting is handled by the two rules Disjunctive case splitting is handled by the two rules
\semlab{Case$_1$} and \semlab{Case$_2$}. The former rule handles the
\semlab{Case_1} and \semlab{Case_2}. The former rule handles the
success case, when the scrutinee's tag $\ell$ matches the tag of the success case, when the scrutinee's tag $\ell$ matches the tag of the
success clause, thus binds the payload $V$ to $x$ and proceeds to success clause, thus binds the payload $V$ to $x$ and proceeds to
evaluate the continuation $M$. The latter rule handles the evaluate the continuation $M$. The latter rule handles the

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save