mirror of
https://github.com/dhil/phd-dissertation
synced 2026-03-13 02:58:26 +00:00
Characterise static administrative redexes
This commit is contained in:
23
thesis.tex
23
thesis.tex
@@ -2499,10 +2499,20 @@ whether it is \emph{static} or \emph{dynamic}. A static administrative
|
|||||||
redex is a by-product of the translation that does not contribute to
|
redex is a by-product of the translation that does not contribute to
|
||||||
the implementation of the dynamic behaviour of the preimage.
|
the implementation of the dynamic behaviour of the preimage.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
In contrast, a dynamic administrative redex is a genuine
|
The separation between value and computation terms in fine-grain
|
||||||
implementation detail that supports some part of the dynamic behaviour
|
call-by-value makes it evident where static administrative redexes can
|
||||||
of the preimage. An example of such a detail is the implementation of
|
arise. They arise from computation terms, which can clearly be seen
|
||||||
effect forwarding. In $\HCalc$ effect forwarding involves no auxiliary
|
from the translation where each computation term induces a
|
||||||
|
$\lambda$-abstraction. Each induced $\lambda$-abstraction must
|
||||||
|
necessarily be eliminated by a unary application. These unary
|
||||||
|
applications are administrative; they do not correspond to reductions
|
||||||
|
in the preimage. Instead the applications that do correspond to
|
||||||
|
reductions in the preimage are the binary continuation applications.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A dynamic administrative redex is a genuine implementation detail that
|
||||||
|
supports some part of the dynamic behaviour of the preimage. An
|
||||||
|
example of such a detail is the implementation of effect
|
||||||
|
forwarding. In $\HCalc$ effect forwarding involves no auxiliary
|
||||||
reductions, any operation invocation is instantaneously dispatched to
|
reductions, any operation invocation is instantaneously dispatched to
|
||||||
a suitable handler (if such one exists).
|
a suitable handler (if such one exists).
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
@@ -2517,11 +2527,6 @@ Section~\ref{sec:first-order-explicit-resump} administrative
|
|||||||
reductions due to resumption invocation can be dealt with by choosing
|
reductions due to resumption invocation can be dealt with by choosing
|
||||||
a more clever implementation of resumptions.
|
a more clever implementation of resumptions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% We can characterise static administrative redexes\dots
|
|
||||||
% \dhil{Characterise static redexes\dots}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \dhil{Discuss dynamic and static administrative redex.}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Resumptions as explicit reversed stacks}
|
\subsection{Resumptions as explicit reversed stacks}
|
||||||
\label{sec:first-order-explicit-resump}
|
\label{sec:first-order-explicit-resump}
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user